Language selection


Consultation on transborder dataflows

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.


Please note that this document has been superseded by Consultation on transfers for processing – Reframed discussion document. The text on this page is provided for historical reference, but has been archived to avoid any confusion.


The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) is revisiting its policy position on transborder data flows under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). This includes not only cross border data transfers between controllers and processors, but also other cross border disclosures of personal information between organizations. 

The OPC is committed to consulting with stakeholders on changes to its policy positions. This document aims to explain how the OPC’s approach on cross border data flows, including transborder transfers for processing, has evolved and to solicit feedback from interested parties.


Under PIPEDA, any collection, use or disclosure of personal information requires consent, unless an exception to the consent requirement applies.  In the absence of an applicable exception, the OPC’s view is that transfers for processing, including cross border transfers, require consent as they involve the disclosure of personal information from one organization to another. Naturally, other disclosures between organizations that are not in a controller/processor relationship, including cross border disclosures, also require consent. 

For consent to be valid, individuals must be provided with clear information about any disclosure to a third party, including instances when they are located in another country, and the associated risks.  When determining the form of consent (express or implied), companies will need to consider  the sensitivity of the information and individuals’ reasonable expectations. We believe individuals would generally expect to know whether and where their personal information may be transferred or otherwise disclosed to an organization outside Canada.

Organizations that have obtained consent to transfer an individual’s personal information across a border in the context of processing will generally remain accountable for the information following its transfer.  As stated in PIPEDA’s accountability principle (4.1), the controller will still be required to use contractual or other means to provide a comparable level of protection while the information is being processed.

The OPC’s 2009 guidelines stated there are different approaches to protecting personal information that is being transferred for processing. The guidelines went on to suggest that “in contrast to (the European Union’s) state-to-state approach, Canada has, through PIPEDA, chosen an organization-to-organization approach that is not based on the concept of adequacy.”

While it is true that Canada does not have an adequacy regime and that PIPEDA in part regulates cross border data processing through the accountability principle, nothing in PIPEDA exempts data transfers, inside or outside Canada, from consent requirements. Therefore, as a matter of law, consent is required. Our view, then, is that cross-border data flows are not only matters decided by states (trade agreements and laws) and organizations (commercial agreements); individuals ought to and do, under PIPEDA, have a say in whether their personal information will be disclosed outside Canada.

Organizations are free to design their operations to include flows of personal information across borders, but they must respect individuals’ right to make that choice for themselves as part of the consent process. In other words, individuals cannot dictate to an organization that it must design its operations in such a way that personal information must stay in Canada (data localisation), but organizations cannot dictate to individuals that their personal information will cross borders unless, with meaningful information, they consent to this.

We have considered the implications of our position in the context of cross-border trade and the importance of information flows for the purpose of facilitating commerce.  In our view, this position is consistent with Canada’s international trade obligations.

Key points

Stakeholders are encouraged to review the following key points which expand upon our position:


A company that is disclosing personal information across a border, including for processing, must obtain consent. Individuals must be given the opportunity to exercise their legal right to consent to disclosures across borders, regardless of whether these are transfers for processing or other types of disclosures. When information is disclosed between organizations, absent an exemption in PIPEDA, consent is required. 

Under PIPEDA, the form of consent required depends on the sensitivity of the information at issue and the individual’s reasonable expectations in the circumstances.  Underlying the contextual analysis of both sensitivity and reasonable expectations is the risk of harm to the individual. Where there is a meaningful risk that a residual risk of harm will materialize and will be significant, consent should be express, not implied. 

It is the OPC’s view that individuals would reasonably expect to be notified if their information was to be disclosed outside of Canada and be subject to the legal regime of another country.  Whether this affects their decision to enter into a business relationship with an organization or to forego a product or service should be left to the discretion of the individual. 

Individuals must be informed of any options available to them if they do not wish to have their personal information disclosed across borders. As we state in our consent guidance, organizations must make available to individuals a clear and easily accessible choice for any collection, use or disclosure that is not necessary to provide the product or service.  Depending on the circumstances, a transfer for processing may well be integral to the delivery of a service and in such cases, organizations are not obligated to provide an alternative. Nonetheless, by being provided with clear and adequate information about the nature, purpose and consequence of any disclosure of their personal information across borders, individuals will be able to make an informed decision about whether to consent to the disclosure and therefore do business with the organization.


When disclosing personal information to a third party for processing, a company does not relinquish control of the information. That being said, business relationships can be very complex and determining which organization has personal information “under its control” needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis, and informed by factors such as relevant contractual arrangements, commercial realities, as well as evolving business models and shifting roles. For instance, if an organization that is a processor uses or discloses the same personal information for other purposes, it is no longer simply processing the personal information on behalf of another organization and is thereby acting as an organization “in control” of the information.

An organization that processes personal information on behalf of another organization may still have obligations under the Act in respect of the personal information in its possession or custody, as an organization that collects, uses or discloses personal information in the course of commercial activities.


The OPC intends to provide guidance on disclosures for processing and related consent and accountability requirements. We welcome input from interested parties on our updated policy position, as well as on specific areas for which related guidance would be most needed.

This update to the OPC’s policy position will impact a number of existing guidance documents on our website. These will be marked with a notice as we work to update the affected text.

Supplementary discussion document

We have developed a supplementary discussion document to explain the reasons that have led us to revisit our policy position on this issue. We have also set out some additional questions to which we would appreciate responses.

Feedback criteria and procedures:

  1. Please send your response to by June 28, 2019 (updated).
  2. Your feedback may be sent in the form of an email, Word or pdf document.
  3. Please indicate your name, contact information and category which best represents your perspective (e.g. individual, organization, academic, advocacy group, information technologist, educator, etc.)
  4. Any comments that violate Canadian law or violate our comment policy will not be considered within scope of this call for feedback and will either be deleted or dealt with in accordance with our legal authorities under the Privacy Act.

A confirmation email will be sent if your email address has been provided in accordance with the terms above.

Please note that the OPC is not providing funding for any feedback related to this call for comment.

Your feedback and privacy

Your feedback will not be posted on the OPC website; however an overall summary of comments may be posted on the OPC’s website. If you post your feedback online, please advise us and provide us with a link. If you are submitting previously published works as part of your feedback, please include appropriate references and links.

The OPC is subject to the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act. The Access to Information Act provides a public right of access to government records. The Privacy Act provides individuals with a right of access to their own personal information and protects that information from unauthorized disclosure. Some of the information you provide to us in this process may be accessible under the Access to Information Act; this does not include personal information as defined in the Privacy Act.

If you choose to participate in this consultation, the personal information that you provide directly to the OPC is included in Personal Information Bank PSU 938 Outreach Activities. Please also see the OPC’s Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, and comment policy for how we handle your information. The personal information you provide will be used and may be disclosed for the purpose for which the information was obtained or compiled by the OPC, or for a use consistent with that purpose.

Feedback will not be treated as a privacy complaint under the Privacy Act or PIPEDA. For further information on filing complaints under either Act, please see File a formal privacy complaint.

Contact us

If you have any questions about this consultation, please direct them to

If you have a question unrelated to this call for feedback, please use our Online Information Request form or contact our Information Centre.

Date modified: